![]() |
Think Resolution. |
||
![]() |
Workplace Q & A My Child at the Workplace Since my daughter was very little, she has come in to where I work and remained at or near my office, in a secure "non-public" area of the workplace, for two-to-four hours each afternoon. Until three months ago, when a new person assumed the role of my supervisor, I never had even one problem. However, within two weeks of this new person beginning as VP of human resources, he has made threats about my daughter in my office on a regular basis in the late afternoon. I have never had any negative feedback from anyone until just now. Questions: Does the federal government through any mechanism have protections to my rights as a parent, based on a longstanding allowance of my child being at work? Is it discriminatory to single out a "single-parent," who is supposed to work 55 to 60 hours a week: to force her to pay a private care giver, when in fact allowing my child to stay near me is not costing them anything? According to the OSHA rep (visited our building in 1997), I do not work in or near any hazardous equipment, materials or the like, whereby I could have created any potential liability for myself or my employer as it may relate to having a minor-child in the proximity of any accident likely environment. Can I execute a parental leave privilege if forced to get a daycare-giver? Signed "Caring Parent" Dear Caring Parent: As a mother, who was working (and single at one point) when my son was growing up, I can appreciate your frustration and concern about not being allowed to keep your child at the office. You did not indicate in which state you reside, so in terms of "parental leave" I would be unable to review your specific state laws to see how this subject is addressed and I am unfamiliar with any type of "parental leave" unless it comes under the nature of the Family Medical Leave Act (for example). In the case of FMLA, your situation, as you describe it, would not be a qualifying event for parental leave. In terms of whether your company would be obligated to allow you to continue this practice, since you did so without objection in the past, this could be the case, IF you had a written contract with your company that made this practice a term of the contract. There are no federal regulations that requires an employer to continue a practice which is not in itself a federal regulation or law. As far as being discriminated against because as a single parent you would be required to pay for child care, discrimination would only be an appropriate charge if other (non-single) parents were treated in a more favorable light; e.g., they are being paid for child care and you are not. In addition, companies are allowed to make policies and to change policies, benefits, rules and regulations (unless they are illegal and/or discriminatory in nature). This means that your company is not under an obligation to continue the practice of allowing your child to come to your office. What then are your options if you have no legal recourse? Attempt to work out a deal with your "new supervisor." Here is my recommended approach:
Good luck to you and let me know how things go. Mary Rau-Foster Next Question and Answer Previous Question and Answer List of All Workplace Issues Questions Ask Your Own Workplace Issue Question Need Training for Your Staff? Call us at 1-615-371-2900. We're on USA Central Time (GMT -6:00). Read how our Training and Consulting can help you. E-mail us at |
HomeMotivating Moments book by Mary Email a friend about our site!
Are you dealing with Healthcare-specific Workplace Issues? Visit our sister site fosterseminars.com |
|